Showing posts with label Muslim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslim. Show all posts

Monday, 10 December 2012

In Accompany With Fundamentalist, Religious, Realistic People !!



Alright, I've been thinking about this for a while...how to approach the subject.
Before I do, let me throw a few things at you, so you know where I'm coming from:

·         I'm not an atheist but believe on realistic approach towards the issue , but you knew that right? I don't like being linked with atheists because saying you're an atheist creates all sorts of connotations, the most obvious being "You're stupid for believing in god". But, many people admit that mainstream atheism (or at least the perception of it) is that it's combative and evangelical.
·         Science and reason is a starting point, and a means. It is not the endpoint, or an end in itself. So I tend not to get hung up on it, or get in arguments with people over science vs. religion. Particularly if the spiritual/atheistic person isn't intelligent enough to understand the argument. Fundamentalism, either scientific or religious, is a problem. The left has the same problem, identifying anyone on the right as stupid, uncaring, and wrong-headed.

Confirmation bias and systems-thinking orientation, I have 'rational/scientific' friends. I have conspiratorial friends. I have political, postmodern, and spiritual friends. All these friends look at the world though a set of lenses (their system of understanding), however I don't really have any friends who are able to employ more than one of these systems.
Funny thing is that all these people are convinced that they're right, and that their way of understanding the world is the one true way.
Problem is the world is full of people, with all these different knowledge systems. And those systems guide their behavior. If you want to understand why someone does something, you need to understand their motivation, and how they look at the world. Unfortunately, not many people are doing this. And for those who CAN do this, seldom have they weighed the pros and cons of the other knowledge system. They’ve only looked at it from their own knowledge system, to find the holes to attack, so they can feel confident and secure in their belief that their own knowledge system is the best knowledge system.

Sunday, 7 October 2012

Din e Elahi: Mass Peace Program


Jalal-ud-Din Akbar (1556-1605), the son of Humayun had three main phases in his life. One was firm belief in religion holding the founding tenets of Islam. The second started when he opened the doors of religious natter and dialogues in which he invited the religious scholars of different sects of Islam in the “Ibadat Khana” (the place of worship) but soon he was disillusioned with the attitudes of the Maulvies and scholars who started losing their tempers and even abused one another on petty issues.

Therefore the subsequent phase resulted in the promulgation of a new religion, din-e-Elahi. He accumulated the best practices of Islam, Hinduism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism and Jainism and propounded the new religion in 1581.
 There are ten virtues which the Din-e-Elahi professes.
(1) liberal-mindedness and generosity
(2) forgiveness of evil-doers and repulsion of anger with mildness
(3) abstinence from worldly desires
(4) non-attachment to the materialistic world
(5) careful weighing of pros and cons of actions to be taken
(6) performance of noble deeds with courage
(7) softness of voice and gentle speech
(8) good behaviour to others
(9) absolutely no connection with bad characters and evil-doers
(10) total dedication to God

Din-e-Elahi was more an ethical cult than a religion as it did not present any common prayers or system as all these eclectic religions offered. It was based on ethical values considering and propagating slander, lust, and pride as deadly sins whereas piety, kindness, mercy as the commonalities of the diverse religions and were appreciated. Slaughter of cow was prohibited to accommodate Hinduism and celibacy was venerated. The religion had no script or written documentations. Din-e-Elahi could triumph over only 19 adherents consisting mostly of Muslims. Hindus and other religions did not embrace it though they appreciated the religious move of Akbar.
Din-e- Elahi met with fierce criticism by the believers of Islam as he denied the foundations of religion by appreciating celibacy and the prohibition of cow. The Hindus also could not accept it as a religion. Din-e-Elahi was intended to create harmony and integrity among the different religions though it could not bring the desired fruits.I think interpretation of religious teachings according to the wishes and agenda of rulers is not a new phenomenon. This is almost as old as the religion itself. Many scholars refused to act as Qazi under Muslim rulers, just because they were afraid of to act according to ruler's wish and not according to God's law.
Do me a favour answering one question, what is most important? Fighting on basis of religion for years or accepting each other perspective and living together with peace!
What if Din-e-Elahi succeeded and there would be a no separation of South Asia? What would be the present scenario then?


Wednesday, 8 August 2012

Our religion is perfect... Or is it?


It is the holy month of Ramazan these days, and the time of forgiveness, abstinence, and prayer has been upon us for quite some time. This year’s Ramazan was one we all had been dreading, for it was stationed in the extremely hot months of July and August. Some of the days were extremely tough, whereas others were relatively easy upon us. It was one of these days where I found myself musing over the fact that eighteen days of Ramazan have passed already. My brain registered this fact with a certain degree of shock, for it didn’t quite feel like the feat it was supposed to. I remember a time when the first fifteen days of Ramazan seemed interminable, and the huge sigh of relief we would heave when they had passed. But now, nothing. It seemed like the eighteen days of Ramazan were not much different from any other ordinary day,

And suddenly, it struck me why. It’s because the days of Ramazan are nothing more than ordinary days for us. Think about it: what more meaning does the month of Ramazan hold for most of us other than abstaining from food and drink? It is common to hear people exclaiming with pride, “tera bhai Sehri k baad soya aur Iftar se ghanta pehlay utha!” (Your brother slept after Sehri and awoke just an hour before Iftar time!). What is the point of fasting then? Because the purpose of the holy month of Ramazan is so much more than to merely make us realize the hardships of having to go without food and drink. It is the month where the gates of forgiveness are opened, and the devil is chained. It is the perfect opportunity to seek forgiveness for your sins, and set your priorities right. But if we do not avail these wonderful opportunities, then our fasting is nothing more than mindlessly subjecting our body to physical discomfort, is it?

And then I realized that this small, trivial thought has far-reaching implications. It is just not our Ramazan that has this problem, rather the whole of our religion. Islam is not just a mere religion; it is a complete code of life. It has given us counsel on each and every detail of life, minute as it might be. But we have restricted our religion to nothing more than its practices. If a person prays five times a day regularly, and he fasts, and he reads the Quran, we proclaim him to be a “pakka Jannati”. He is the most pious person ever. Is Islam restricted to religious practices only? What of all the rest of the things that Islam teaches us? What of all the small things such as how to how to treat your parents, how to behave with your teachers, what to do and what to refrain from in a social gathering, the concept of ‘Pardah’, refrain from backbiting and flattery and whatnot? Here’s a little example to elaborate. Often when hanging out with friends, we tend to taunt or insult each other (the correct term for it in Urdu is ‘point maarna’), or we tend to swear at others in general conversation. The victim flushes and retaliates. This kind of thing is usually done in a joking and relaxed manner, so it’s all good… Or is it? Think about the person you taunt or swear at. He retaliates, but what about the small stab of pain/hurt he feels before that? It may be momentary and trivial, but it is there nonetheless. And how is the Muslim defined? According to a rough translation, “A Muslim is he by whose hand and tongue other Muslims are safe”. We tend to forget all these little things and more that make Islam the perfect religion, and choose instead to declare ourselves the perfect Muslim based solely on following the Islamic practices.

Then there is another factor that needs to be mentioned here: the fact that we have made Islam a more restricted religion than it really is. People supporting the ‘liberal’ viewpoint often label Islam as an extremist religion, and they aren’t far off. Truth is, in our mindless battle to support Islam against the Western practices, we often end up condemning practices and concepts that are actually permitted. Consider the concept of education for girls. Hadeeth says, “Education is compulsory for every Muslim, man or woman”. Yet we maintain that girls should not get education. The concept of girls and boys studying together. It is one of those things we love to hate, and while it is not exactly favored in Islam, it’s not forbidden either, as long as the students dress properly and obey the limits. Then some people tend to limit religion to language. They consider it wrong to converse in languages such as Hebrew, the language of the Jews. But one must understand that it is not the language that is bad, rather the things were said in them. Conversing in Hebrew would not automatically be bad, or wrong. The perfect analogy to explain this scenario is to consider Islam as a pond of clear water; the perfect religion, a complete code of life. But what we tend to do is fill a cup of water from this pond, and make it the extent of our religion. Can the people be blamed for calling Islam an extremist religion then?

This small, trivial thought provides a possible answer to a very crucial question very common nowadays: Islam is perfect, but Muslims are not. Why is that? In my opinion, there is a difference between the Islam that is and the Islam we follow. We only follow a small chunk of the whole religion that is Islam. No one bothers to conduct a little research, to find out the extent of what Islam demands and offers outside of religious practices. Islam is perfect, but Muslims are not? No. The Islam we follow is not perfect. How then, can the Muslims be perfect?